A Level Politics - Pressure Groups - Defence: the ‘military-industrial complex’

A Level Politics - Pressure Groups - Defence: the ‘military-industrial complex’
I. The Military-Industrial Complex (MIC):

• Eisenhower's Warning (1961): President Eisenhower cautioned against the growing power of the MIC, fearing its potential to prioritize its own interests over the public good, leading to misallocation of power and resources. He advocated for reduced military spending.
• The Reality: Despite Eisenhower's concerns, successive US governments have maintained, and even increased, military spending to uphold the nation's global military dominance. This has led to the entrenchment of a small number of powerful defense firms (Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman) within the military infrastructure.

II. Mechanisms of Influence:

• Lobbying: Defense companies invest heavily in lobbying efforts (Lockheed Martin spends ~$14 million annually). This influences Congressional members to support their objectives. The widespread operations of these companies across many states and districts amplify their influence.
• Campaign Donations: Millions of dollars are donated to political campaigns (>$30 million in 2018 alone). This broad distribution maximizes influence across Congress, with significant donations directed towards members of powerful defense committees. The example of Congressman Joe Courtney, nicknamed "Two Subs Joe," illustrates how securing defense contracts for a district can become a key campaign platform.
• Personal Investments: Many members of Congress, including those on key committees like the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, hold personal investments in defense companies. This creates a direct financial incentive to support contracts benefiting those companies. Senator Roy Blunt's Lockheed Martin stock ownership is a prime example.
• The "Too Big to Fail" Argument: Companies like Lockheed Martin have become so integrated into numerous weapons systems that their failure would have significant military and economic consequences, creating an implicit government guarantee of continued support.
• The Revolving Door: Personnel frequently move between defense contractors and government positions (e.g., the Pentagon). This facilitates the flow of influence and potentially compromises objective decision-making. The case of Patrick Shanahan, moving from Boeing to a senior position in the Department of Defense, highlights this.

III. The Iron Triangle:
Gordon Adams's "iron triangle" concept describes the symbiotic relationship between:

• Defense Contractors: Powerful companies seeking government contracts.
• Congressional Committees (particularly defense committees): Seeking funding for their districts and influence in policy.
• The Department of Defense (Pentagon): Responsible for allocating defense budgets and overseeing contracts.

This mutually beneficial relationship reinforces the MIC's influence and can lead to inflated budgets and questionable procurement decisions.
IV. Key Concepts to Understand:

• Military-Industrial Complex: The interconnectedness of the military, government, and defense industries.
• Iron Triangle: The symbiotic relationship between defense contractors, Congress, and the Department of Defense.
• Lobbying: The practice of influencing government policy through persuasion and financial contributions.
• Campaign Donations: Financial contributions to political campaigns to influence candidates and policy.
• Revolving Door: The movement of personnel between government and private sector jobs.

V. Activities for Deeper Understanding:

• Investigate Congressman Joe Courtney's use of defense spending in his campaigns (link provided in original text).
• Research other sectors with significant political campaign investment (link provided in original text). Analyze why these sectors invest so heavily.

To learn more about A Level Politics Click Here