A Level Politics - Comparing Electoral and Party System - Theoretical approaches to electoral and party systems

A Level Politics - Comparing Electoral and Party System - Theoretical approaches to electoral and party systems

I. Elections

A. Structural Approach

Feature	UK	US	Key Difference
Term Length	Fixed, but easily altered (snap elections)	Fixed, rigid	UK's flexibility vs. US rigidity
Number of Offices	Fewer	Many more	Scale of elected positions
Electoral System	Primarily majoritarian, some regional alternatives	Primarily majoritarian	Greater use of alternative systems in UK regions

B. Rational Choice Approach

• Focus: Both countries concentrate campaign efforts on marginal seats/swing states, where elections are decided.
• Voter Behavior: FPTP systems encourage strategic voting for major parties to avoid "wasted votes" in both countries.
• Campaign Strategy: Both countries prioritize mobilizing core voters and appealing to independent voters (avoiding controversial policies that might alienate moderates).

C. Cultural Approach

Feature	UK	US	Key Difference
Campaign Emphasis	Increasingly presidential in style	Strong emphasis on individual personalities	Shift towards US-style personality-driven campaigns in UK
Candidate Selection	Primarily by party members	Greater public participation (primaries, caucuses)	Level of public involvement in candidate selection
Voter Behavior	Historically reflects group priorities (youth=progressive, seniors=conservative)	Similar historical trends (youth=progressive, seniors=conservative)	Shared pattern of generational voting preferences

II. Campaign Finance

A. Structural Approach

Feature	UK	US	Key Difference
Campaign Finance Laws	Much tougher	Less stringent	Stringency of regulations
State Funding	Greater use, including free broadcasts	Less state funding	Level of government support for campaigns
Role of Courts	Actively investigate and convict irregularities	Significant role in weakening campaign finance regulation	Judicial influence on campaign finance

B. Rational Choice Approach

• Political Donations: Greater opportunities for donations in the US lead to heavy spending by interest groups; UK charity law restricts this.
• Fundraising Importance: Fundraising is crucial in both, but doesn't guarantee victory; other campaign aspects are essential.
• Spending Focus: Both concentrate spending on competitive races in swing states/marginal constituencies.

C. Cultural Approach

Feature	UK	US	Key Difference
Political Donors	More subtle, associated with unions/businesses	Strong culture of individual political donors	Nature and scale of political donations
First Amendment Influence	Less emphasis on unlimited political donation freedom	Strong emphasis on freedom of speech and association relating to donation	Impact of constitutional protection on campaign finance
Suspicion of Corruption	Longstanding suspicion of donations influencing policy or honours	Similar suspicion of links between donations and favors	Shared concern about potential corruption through donations

Study Tips:

• Compare and Contrast: Focus on the similarities and differences between the two systems for each theoretical approach. Create a table summarizing key points for easy comparison.
• Critical Thinking: Consider the limitations of each theoretical approach. Are there aspects of the electoral and party systems that aren't fully explained by these lenses?
• Real-World Examples: Research specific examples of elections or campaign finance controversies in both the UK and US to illustrate the concepts discussed.
• Develop Arguments: Practice formulating arguments explaining the strengths and weaknesses of each system based on the information presented.

To learn more about A Level Politics Click Here