A Level Politics – Civil Rights-Affirmative Action

A Level Politics – Civil Rights-Affirmative Action
This summarizes the complex issue of affirmative action in the US, focusing on key aspects for effective understanding.
I. What is Affirmative Action?

• Definition: Affirmative action is a set of policies designed to address historical and systemic inequalities faced by racial minorities (primarily African Americans). It involves preferential treatment in employment and education to increase representation of these groups. Crucially, it's considered a positive form of discrimination, deliberately counteracting existing discrimination.

II. The Political Divide:

• Liberal/Democrat Support: Liberals and Democrats generally support affirmative action, viewing it as a necessary tool to level the playing field, acknowledging the persistent economic and social disadvantages faced by people of color. Prominent supporters include Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The rationale centers on fairness and addressing historical injustices.
• Conservative/Republican Opposition: Conservatives and Republicans largely oppose affirmative action, arguing it constitutes "reverse discrimination." They contend that preferential treatment based on race violates the principle of equal opportunity, potentially disadvantaging qualified individuals from majority groups (White Americans) or successful minority groups (e.g., Asian Americans) who may face higher admission standards. Notable opponents include George W. Bush and Donald Trump.

III. Legal and Practical Aspects:

• State Variations: Affirmative action policies vary significantly by state. Nine states currently ban it. The 2020 California rejection of Proposition 16 highlights ongoing public debate and opposition.
• Supreme Court Involvement: The Supreme Court's stance on affirmative action has been inconsistent. While Fisher v. University of Texas (2016) upheld the legality of race-conscious admissions under specific conditions, the crucial swing vote was provided by Justice Anthony Kennedy.
• Shifting Court Dynamics: The shift to a conservative 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court since 2018 (including the appointment of Amy Coney Barrett) has significantly increased the likelihood of future challenges to affirmative action. The Trump administration's 2020 amicus brief against Harvard University's admissions policies underscores this shift. While the lower court ruled in Harvard’s favor, the Supreme Court now has the potential to overturn established precedents.

IV. Key Terms and Concepts:

• Reverse Discrimination: The argument that affirmative action discriminates against individuals from majority or other minority groups by giving preferential treatment based solely on race.
• Equal Opportunity: The principle that everyone should have a fair chance regardless of race or background. This is the central point of contention in the affirmative action debate.
• Amicus Brief: A legal document filed by an entity not directly involved in a case to offer information or arguments to the court.

V. Study Questions:

1. Define affirmative action and explain its core purpose.
2. Describe the key arguments for and against affirmative action.
3. How does the political landscape in the US influence the debate on affirmative action?
4. Summarize the Supreme Court's role in shaping affirmative action policies.
5. Explain the significance of the shift in the Supreme Court's composition and its potential implications for future affirmative action cases.
6. What is the significance of Fisher v. University of Texas?
7. What is "reverse discrimination," and how is it a central argument against affirmative action?

To learn more about A Level Politics Click Here